NY Times: Man, this is a typical Met game to me. They lost the game tonight because their starting pitcher got called for 3 balks. He actually got caught on camera committing a fourth balk but the umps let that one go. Final score, Mets 0, SF Giants 2.
Showing posts with label Mike Pelfrey. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mike Pelfrey. Show all posts
Sunday, May 17, 2009
3 Balks by Pelfrey
NY Times: Man, this is a typical Met game to me. They lost the game tonight because their starting pitcher got called for 3 balks. He actually got caught on camera committing a fourth balk but the umps let that one go. Final score, Mets 0, SF Giants 2.
Wednesday, April 15, 2009
Pelfrey over-worked in 2008?
Bob Shpigel of NY Times writes about a theory behind Pelfrey's struggles this season. I feel it's a little early in the season to tell if he has a dead arm or if it just might be that Pelfrey is over-rated.
The Sports Illustrated writer Tom Verducci developed a theory that any pitcher younger than 25 who increases his innings total by 30 or more from the previous season has a greater risk of injury or a decline in his performance. He counts Pelfrey among the 10 prime candidates for a regression this season, along with Cole Hamels (bothered by elbow problems), Jon Lester (0-2, 9.00 E.R.A.) and Tim Lincecum (0-1, 7.56 E.R.A.).
Of the 25-year-old Pelfrey, Manager Jerry Manuel said Monday night, “I haven’t seen his real good stuff yet,” then speculated that he could be going through a dead-arm period, which is rare at such an early stage of the season.
“I don’t know if that’s the case, but I just haven’t seen some of the stuff he showed last year,” Manuel said. “We’re going to sit down and see if there’s anything possibly wrong with him. We’ll watch him a little bit, maybe give him an extra day’s rest here and there. See if we can get that life back. I just haven’t seen the life in those pitches.”
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)